<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for J. Carlos Navea - loconet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.loconet.ca/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.loconet.ca</link>
	<description>Constantly learning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 06:32:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rant on the complete disaster that is Ubuntu&#8217;s Unity by Iqtedar</title>
		<link>http://www.loconet.ca/2011/11/01/rant-on-the-complete-disaster-that-is-ubuntus-unity/comment-page-1/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>Iqtedar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 06:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loconet.ca/?p=216#comment-465</guid>
		<description>The Unity UI is counter-intuitive, inconsistent and counter-productive. It makes certain assumptions that should not be taken for granted. It is like a closed shop where you have to know beforehand what you want and ask for it but you cannot browse easily. It needlessly takes extra clicks to navigate the dash. It seems they tried to imitate the Mac&#039;s interface in some respects but they took the wrong bits and left out the right ones. I am also using Gnome now because at least it is heading in the right direction but I hope it improves feature wise as some of the extensions should really be built in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Unity UI is counter-intuitive, inconsistent and counter-productive. It makes certain assumptions that should not be taken for granted. It is like a closed shop where you have to know beforehand what you want and ask for it but you cannot browse easily. It needlessly takes extra clicks to navigate the dash. It seems they tried to imitate the Mac&#8217;s interface in some respects but they took the wrong bits and left out the right ones. I am also using Gnome now because at least it is heading in the right direction but I hope it improves feature wise as some of the extensions should really be built in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ca.loconet.android Tip by loconet</title>
		<link>http://www.loconet.ca/2011/06/12/ca-loconet-android-tip/comment-page-1/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>loconet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 02:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loconet.ca/?p=198#comment-433</guid>
		<description>Hey Michael,

I&#039;m very likely misunderstanding the problem you are seeing. In my case, &quot;back&quot; takes me back to whatever activity was active before the target activity. So for example, let&#039;s say the activity stack looks like this, A-&gt;B-&gt;C, if I then trigger the &quot;Go Home&quot;  code from &quot;C&quot; and &quot;Home&quot; is defined as &quot;A&quot;, it will take me to A (without creating a new instance of A). If then I hit the &#039;back&#039; button it takes me out of the application and onto the HC &quot;desktop&quot; which is what I would expect it to do. 

Do let me know if you solved your issue, I&#039;m curious as to what is going on. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Michael,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m very likely misunderstanding the problem you are seeing. In my case, &#8220;back&#8221; takes me back to whatever activity was active before the target activity. So for example, let&#8217;s say the activity stack looks like this, A->B->C, if I then trigger the &#8220;Go Home&#8221;  code from &#8220;C&#8221; and &#8220;Home&#8221; is defined as &#8220;A&#8221;, it will take me to A (without creating a new instance of A). If then I hit the &#8216;back&#8217; button it takes me out of the application and onto the HC &#8220;desktop&#8221; which is what I would expect it to do. </p>
<p>Do let me know if you solved your issue, I&#8217;m curious as to what is going on. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ca.loconet.android Tip by Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.loconet.ca/2011/06/12/ca-loconet-android-tip/comment-page-1/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 02:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loconet.ca/?p=198#comment-431</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the helpful article!

The use of 
intent.addFlags(Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_CLEAR_TOP &#124; Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_SINGLE_TOP);

does not seem to do the trick either. I end up still able to use &quot;Back&quot; to navigate backwards through the stack. In essence, it appears as though the new instance is added to the stack in the same way that I would add any new Intent. &quot;Back&quot; still takes the user back through the stack, stepping through all of the previously visited Activities. Here is the code I am using:

	private void home() {
      Intent intent = new Intent(this, Main.class);
      intent.addFlags(Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_CLEAR_TOP &#124; Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_SINGLE_TOP);
      startActivity(intent);
	}

An ideas?

Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the helpful article!</p>
<p>The use of<br />
intent.addFlags(Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_CLEAR_TOP | Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_SINGLE_TOP);</p>
<p>does not seem to do the trick either. I end up still able to use &#8220;Back&#8221; to navigate backwards through the stack. In essence, it appears as though the new instance is added to the stack in the same way that I would add any new Intent. &#8220;Back&#8221; still takes the user back through the stack, stepping through all of the previously visited Activities. Here is the code I am using:</p>
<p>	private void home() {<br />
      Intent intent = new Intent(this, Main.class);<br />
      intent.addFlags(Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_CLEAR_TOP | Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_SINGLE_TOP);<br />
      startActivity(intent);<br />
	}</p>
<p>An ideas?</p>
<p>Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gnome-Do Plugin &#8211; ManLookUp by Morpheus</title>
		<link>http://www.loconet.ca/2008/09/14/gnome-do-plugin-man-lookup/comment-page-1/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>Morpheus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 14:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loconet.ca/?p=87#comment-422</guid>
		<description>ManLookUp &lt;&lt; hahahahaha....thats like a gay directory?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ManLookUp &lt;&lt; hahahahaha&#8230;.thats like a gay directory?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on lget for Firefox 3.6 by Hywel</title>
		<link>http://www.loconet.ca/2010/02/11/lget-for-firefox-3-6/comment-page-1/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>Hywel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 15:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loconet.ca/?p=184#comment-420</guid>
		<description>Any chance we’ll have lget available for Minefield 4.0b2pre?
Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any chance we’ll have lget available for Minefield 4.0b2pre?<br />
Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on lget for Firefox 3.6 by MASA</title>
		<link>http://www.loconet.ca/2010/02/11/lget-for-firefox-3-6/comment-page-1/#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator>MASA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loconet.ca/?p=184#comment-419</guid>
		<description>Would you be willing to add Thunderbird support? All you would have to do is add the Thunderbird stuff to install.rdf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you be willing to add Thunderbird support? All you would have to do is add the Thunderbird stuff to install.rdf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on lget for Firefox 3.6 by loconet</title>
		<link>http://www.loconet.ca/2010/02/11/lget-for-firefox-3-6/comment-page-1/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>loconet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loconet.ca/?p=184#comment-398</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on lget for Firefox 3.6 by Dong-yoon Han</title>
		<link>http://www.loconet.ca/2010/02/11/lget-for-firefox-3-6/comment-page-1/#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>Dong-yoon Han</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loconet.ca/?p=184#comment-397</guid>
		<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

http://www.mediafire.com/file/bzg2n4txmyg/lget_1.0.1_ko-KR.zip

This link contains ko-KR (Korean) locale files. If you are
kindly going to add my translation, please use this. :)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.75

iEYEARECAAYFAkt/yMwACgkQ55Po8yJK/WyyjgCfQFz+9zu/KA6H0WoAmnUWDu6h
WMkAn1b0gDeFc+CrrrLpQZGvrtYp3+66
=wr09
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8212;&#8211;BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Hash: SHA1</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mediafire.com/file/bzg2n4txmyg/lget_1.0.1_ko-KR.zip" rel="nofollow">http://www.mediafire.com/file/bzg2n4txmyg/lget_1.0.1_ko-KR.zip</a></p>
<p>This link contains ko-KR (Korean) locale files. If you are<br />
kindly going to add my translation, please use this. <img src='http://www.loconet.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
&#8212;&#8211;BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) &#8211; GPGshell v3.75</p>
<p>iEYEARECAAYFAkt/yMwACgkQ55Po8yJK/WyyjgCfQFz+9zu/KA6H0WoAmnUWDu6h<br />
WMkAn1b0gDeFc+CrrrLpQZGvrtYp3+66<br />
=wr09<br />
&#8212;&#8211;END PGP SIGNATURE&#8212;&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on lget 1.0 for Firefox 3.5 by iNsuRRecTiON</title>
		<link>http://www.loconet.ca/2009/07/04/lget-1-0-for-firefox-3-5/comment-page-1/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>iNsuRRecTiON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loconet.ca/?p=128#comment-390</guid>
		<description>Hi there,

LGet 1.01 for Fx 3.6 final is available on AMO (addon.mozilla.org).

regards,

iNsuRRecTiON</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>LGet 1.01 for Fx 3.6 final is available on AMO (addon.mozilla.org).</p>
<p>regards,</p>
<p>iNsuRRecTiON</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on lget 1.0 for Firefox 3.5 by Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.loconet.ca/2009/07/04/lget-1-0-for-firefox-3-5/comment-page-1/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 17:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loconet.ca/?p=128#comment-385</guid>
		<description>Thanks for 3.6 the update!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for 3.6 the update!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
